
Examining Single Stage Prop Challenges
Single phase challenges in prop firms have, in recent years, become one of the most attractive routes for traders to gain access to live accounts. Unlike multi phase models, which are time consuming and accompanied by psychological pressure and restrictive rules, these challenges simplify and rationalize the evaluation process by focusing on the trader’s actual ability. In these models, it is sufficient for the trader to demonstrate correct and consistent performance over a single evaluation period in order to enter the real profit making environment without having to go through long, drawn out stages. With increasing competition among prop firms, the structure of single phase challenges is no longer a fixed template, and each firm offers different rules regarding risk management, challenge duration, limitations, and profit withdrawal conditions. These differences have made a thorough examination of single phase models highly important, because choosing a fair structure that matches one’s trading style can either shorten a trader’s path to success or destroy it from the very beginning. This article, with a completely neutral perspective, analyzes and compares the real conditions of prop firms active in this field to determine which structure is fairer and more efficient for traders.
What are Single Stage Challenges in Prop Firms and Why Are They Important?
In recent years, the remarkable growth of the prop trading industry has led to the development of various evaluation challenge models for traders in the market. One of these models that has quickly attracted the attention of professional and semi professional traders is single stage challenges. But what exactly is this model and why has it become so popular?
A single stage challenge refers to an evaluation model where traders receive a live account after successfully passing just one phase. Unlike two stage or even multi stage models that require passing through consecutive phases with diverse conditions, in this model, traders only need to reach specific targets such as a set profit, maintaining drawdown, and meeting minimum risk management standards in a single phase.
The main difference between this model and multi stage models is the speed of entry into a live account, reduced psychological pressure from repeated evaluations, and the possibility of starting to withdraw profits in a much shorter time. On the other hand, time constraints in single stage challenges are usually fewer or don't exist at all, which is particularly valuable for traders with slower trading styles or those seeking deeper market analysis.
Overall, single stage challenges are important because they pave the way for capable traders to enter the real and profitable market space without involving them in exhausting and restrictive multi stage tests. Given the growing competition among prop firms, a careful examination of the conditions of these challenges has now become an important necessity for every trader.
Analysis of Single Stage Challenge Structure in Fenefx Prop

Fenefx Prop has designed its single stage model with the goal of creating a fair, simple, and professional structure for traders that not only makes obtaining a live account easier but also supports continuity in the path to becoming professional.
In Fenefx's single stage challenge, traders are required to generate only 12% profit to successfully pass the evaluation stage. This is while an overall drawdown of 8% and a daily drawdown of 4% are set, which compared to many competitors, has a logical and flexible structure. Another important point is the absence of time constraints for completing the challenge; this means there is no pressure on the trader regarding the speed of executing trades, and they can proceed based on their personal logic and strategy.
Unlike many prop firms, Fenefx doesn't require a minimum number of trading days, which is a significant advantage for those who don't engage in daily trading or are waiting for precise opportunities. Also, in this model, there are no strict rules such as mandatory specific risk management or restrictions on trading hours.
One of the notable strengths of Fenefx is the ability to withdraw profits from the first day of the live account; a capability rarely seen even in well known global prop firms. The initial profit split is 80% in favor of the trader, and the capital growth structure is designed in a way that it activates after the first successful withdrawal.
In summary, Fenefx, while maintaining professional standards, offers one of the most flexible and fair single stage models that provides a fair and profitable structure for both novice traders and experienced traders.
Table of Fenefx’s Single Stage Challenge Conditions
Feature | Conditions in Fenefx |
Required Profit Target | 12% profit |
Maximum Overall Drawdown | 8% |
Maximum Daily Drawdown | 4% |
Challenge Duration | Unlimited |
Trading Calendar | 5 days a week |
Minimum Trading Days Requirement | None |
Mandatory Risk Management Rules | None |
Initial Profit Withdrawal Possibility | From day one |
Initial Profit Split Percentage | 80% |
Incremental Capital Increase | Activated after first withdrawal |
Review of One Phase Plans of Prop Combat
Prop Combat, in order to meet the needs of its clients, offers a wide range of plans, among which two one-phase challenges are also included. Combat One and Combat One Pro are the two single phase challenges of this prop, and in practice they are almost similar to each other, with slight differences designed to distinguish professional traders from non professionals.
In Combat One, you must achieve the selected profit target (chosen at the time of purchasing the plan 8%, 10%, or 13%) within a minimum of 5 trading days. In the Combat One plan, there is no maximum daily loss limit; instead, a 2% daily stop loss option is applied.
Daily stop loss means that if you reach a 2% loss (equity or balance drawdown) relative to the starting balance of the day provided that the total drawdown rule is not violated your account will be automatically disabled by the system, all trades will be closed, and you will not be allowed to trade again until the start of the next trading day. Also, the maximum total loss is selectable by the trader from 5%, 6%, or 8%.
In the Combat One plan, there are no time limits for both the challenge and the funded stage. Trading during news events is also allowed. Additionally, the trader’s profit share is selectable by the user when purchasing the plan from 40%, 60%, or 80%.
After three months of activity in the funded stage, the trader can request a capital increase, provided they meet certain criteria such as 5 profit withdrawals and more. If approved, the account balance will increase by 25% of the initial balance, and 5% will be added to the originally chosen profit-share rate.
Summary Table - Combat Single Phase Challenge
Feature | Details |
Challenge Type | Single phase |
Minimum Trading Days | 5 days |
Profit Targets | 8% / 10% / 13% |
Daily Stop Loss | 2% (automatic closure of trades until next day) |
Maximum Total Drawdown | 5% / 6% / 8% (selectable) |
Daily Max Drawdown | None (only 2% stop loss applies) |
Challenge Time Limit | No limit |
Funded Stage Time Limit | No limit |
News Trading | Allowed |
Trader Profit Share | 40% / 60% / 80% (selectable) |
Capital Increase Opportunity | After 3 months with conditions (5 profit withdrawals etc.) |
Amount of Capital Increase | +25% of initial balance + +5% added to profit share |
Stop-Loss Basis | Starting balance of the day (equity or balance drawdown) |
Introduction to One Phase Challenges of Prop Unicorn

The single phase challenge of Prop Unicorn is designed with an 8% profit target and consists of two sequential stages: the first stage “Challenge Start” and the second stage “Funded Account”. In the Challenge Start stage, the trader must reach an 8% profit target within a minimum of 4 trading days and within a time limit of 30 calendar days. The risk rules in this stage include: maximum daily drawdown of 3%, overall drawdown of 6%, and allowed relative drawdown of 2%. The cost of purchasing this challenge is $20. After successfully completing stage one, the trader enters the funded account stage.
In the funded account stage, the trader must complete a minimum of 7 trading days and achieve the same 8% profit target while trading with the funded capital. This stage has no time limit. The risk rules remain identical to those of the previous stage: maximum daily drawdown 3%, overall drawdown 6%, and relative drawdown 2%. Upon complying with these rules, the trader can benefit from a 60% capital growth opportunity. Additionally, a 130% refund of the challenge fee is awarded, demonstrating the strong support this prop firm provides to successful traders.
Summary Table - Unicorn Single Phase Challenge
Feature | Stage 1: Challenge Start | Stage 2: Funded Account |
Profit Target | 8% | 8% |
Challenge Duration | 30 calendar days | Unlimited |
Minimum Trading Days | 4 days | 7 days |
Maximum Daily Drawdown | 3% | 3% |
Overall Drawdown | 6% | 6% |
Allowed Relative Drawdown | 2% | 2% |
Challenge Fee | $20 | – |
Capital Growth Opportunity | – | 60% |
Refund | – | 130% |
Analysis of Single Stage Challenge Structure in Last Prop
The prop firm “Last Prop,” which is now operating under its rebranded name Zora FX, has designed a highly structured and rule-based framework for its one-phase challenge, making it more suitable for traders who follow a disciplined trading style with strict rule adherence. In this challenge, the trader is required to achieve a 10% profit target, which is considered relatively high compared to the standards of most prop firms and therefore imposes greater risk on the trader.
The 6% overall drawdown and 3% daily drawdown are highly restrictive and demand a very precise strategy in position management. The challenge duration is 40 days, which is reasonably balanced in terms of time; however, the requirement of at least 2 trading days reduces flexibility for low frequency traders or those with a swing trading style.
Mandatory risk management rules in the form of leverage and trade volume limitations make the structure of this challenge highly controlling. Traders will have less freedom in implementing their specific strategies in such an environment. Profit withdrawal is only after the completion of 40 days, and the initial profit split is 70%, which is lower compared to competitors. Additionally, capital increase is subject to two successful withdrawals, which somewhat slows down the account's progress.
Table of Last Prop's Single Stage Challenge Conditions
Feature | Conditions in LastProp |
Required Profit Target | 10% profit |
Maximum Overall Drawdown | 6% |
Maximum Daily Drawdown | 3% |
Challenge Duration | 40 days |
Trading Calendar | 5 days a week |
Minimum Trading Days Requirement | Minimum 2 trading days |
Mandatory Risk Management Rules | Volume and leverage limitations |
Initial Profit Withdrawal Possibility | After 40 days |
Initial Profit Split Percentage | 70% |
Incremental Capital Increase | Activated after two successful withdrawals |
Analysis of Single Stage Challenge Structure in Tamin Sarmayeh Prop
The prop firm Tamin Sarmaye has adopted a more balanced approach compared to its competitors in designing its one phase challenge. This model is defined with a 6% profit target, which is considered a fairly standard level among most prop firms. On the other hand, the 6% overall drawdown (higher than the market average) allows traders more freedom in managing their positions, which is an important advantage for high volatility trading styles.
At the same time, the 2% daily drawdown remains very strict. The challenge duration is defined without a time limit, making it suitable for many traders. Additionally, the minimum trading days rule of 3 days has been added to the prop firm’s regulations.
Profit withdrawal is permitted from the second week, which is an important and notable feature for traders seeking faster liquidity. Additionally, the initial profit split of 80% and the staged capital growth structure proportional to growth percentage indicate flexibility in structure.
Table of Tamin Sarmayeh's Single Stage Challenge Conditions
Feature | Conditions in Tamin Sarmayeh |
Required Profit Target | 6% profit |
Maximum Overall Drawdown | 6% |
Maximum Daily Drawdown | 2% |
Challenge Duration | Unlimited |
Trading Calendar | 5 days a week |
Minimum Trading Days Requirement | 3 day |
Mandatory Risk Management Rules | - |
Initial Profit Withdrawal Possibility | From second week |
Initial Profit Split Percentage | 80% |
Incremental Capital Increase | Staged proportional to growth percentage |
Overall, Tamin Sarmayeh Prop offers a moderate model compatible with the needs of most traders, which is neither overly strict nor without structure. It's suitable for those seeking a balance between freedom of action and framework.
Analysis of Single Stage Challenge Structure in ProopCo
ProopCo has designed its one phase challenge with the goal of creating a structured and well timed framework, offering a 10% profit target and an unlimited time duration. The 6% overall drawdown and 3% daily drawdown are defined, creating a restrictive but manageable structure. In this challenge, the trader has no minimum trading days requirement, a rule that is suitable for traders with lower trading frequency.
One notable aspect of ProopCo’s structure is that profit withdrawals are only allowed after one month, and the initial profit share is set at 80%.
Table of ProopCo's Single Stage Challenge Conditions
Feature | Conditions in ProopCo |
Required Profit Target | 10% profit |
Maximum Overall Drawdown | 6% |
Maximum Daily Drawdown | 3% |
Challenge Duration | 20 days |
Trading Calendar | 5 days a week |
Minimum Trading Days Requirement | None |
Mandatory Risk Management Rules | - |
Initial Profit Withdrawal Possibility | 15 Day after first trade |
Initial Profit Split Percentage | 80% |
Incremental Capital Increase | After re-evaluation every three months |
Analysis of Single Stage Challenge Structure in Prop Plus

Prop Plus is one of the few prop firms that has set a 6% profit target for its single stage challenge. This percentage is lower compared to other competitors, therefore reaching a live account is associated with less risk. However, on the flip side, the structure of this challenge has limitations that should be considered.
The overall drawdown of 6% and daily drawdown of 2% place this challenge in the category of very conservative structures. These values are only suitable for traders with low risk strategies based on precise position control. The challenge duration is set at 30 days, which provides sufficient opportunity to achieve the profit target. Another positive point is the absence of a minimum trading days requirement, which gives traders freedom in scheduling.
Profit withdrawal is only allowed after final confirmation, and the initial profit split is set at 80%. Capital increase is also done in a staggered manner after the second withdrawal, which is more suitable for traders with a long term perspective.
Table of Prop Plus's Single Stage Challenge Conditions
Feature | Conditions in Prop Plus |
Required Profit Target | 6% profit |
Maximum Overall Drawdown | 2% |
Maximum Daily Drawdown | 3% |
Challenge Duration | 30 days |
Trading Calendar | 5 days a week |
Minimum Trading Days Requirement | Not mandatory |
Mandatory Risk Management Rules | Maximum leverage 1:30 |
Initial Profit Withdrawal Possibility | After final confirmation |
Initial Profit Split Percentage | 80% |
Incremental Capital Increase | Staggered increase after second withdrawal |
Overall, Prop Plus offers a balanced structure in terms of profit target and risk limitations, but the level of strictness in drawdown and risk makes it a choice for conservative traders.
Final Comparison of Prop Firms; Which Single Stage Challenge is Fairer?
After examining the structure of single stage challenges among various prop firms, we can now summarize and compare them to determine which of these prop firms offers a fairer, more flexible, and more compatible structure with traders' needs.
Among these, Fenefx Prop, with its structure free of time constraints, no requirement for minimum trading days, no restrictive risk management rules, and the ability to withdraw profits from day one, provides traders with the most flexible model. The required profit percentage (12%) and appropriate drawdown (8% overall and 4% daily) alongside an initial profit split of 80% place this prop in a favorable competitive position.
In contrast, some other prop firms, despite having a clear structure, have limitations such as mandatory trading days, leverage restrictions, or delays in profit withdrawal permissions that cause traders to be more restricted in implementing their strategies. Also, prop firms like PropCo or Proper have specific rules such as maximum trading volume or the requirement for positive floating risk within a limited period, which is challenging for many traders.
Comparative Table of Prop Firms Based on Key Features of Single Stage Challenge
Prop Firm | Profit Target | Overall Drawdown | Daily Drawdown | Challenge Duration | Minimum Trading Days | Additional Risk Rules | Initial Withdrawal | Initial Profit Share | Overall Flexibility |
FeneFx | 12% | 8% | 4% | Unlimited | None | None | From day one | 80% | Very High |
Last Prop (Zora FX) | 10% | 6% | 3% | 40 days | 2 mandatory days | Volume and leverage limits | After 40 days | 70% | Low |
Tamin Sarmaye | 6% | 6% | 2% | Unlimited | 3 mandatory days | Yes | From second week | 80% | Medium |
ProopCo | 10% | 6% | 3% | Unlimited | None | None | 15 days after first trade | 80% | High |
Prop Plus | 6% | 6% | 2% | 30 days | None | Leverage limited to 1:30 | After final approval | 80% | Medium |
Combat (Combat One) | 8% / 10% / 13% (selectable) | 5% / 6% / 8% (selectable) | None (only 2% stop-loss) | Unlimited | 5 mandatory days | 2% daily stop-loss | After specific conditions | 40% / 60% / 80% (selectable) | High |
Unicorn | 8% (both stages) | 6% | 3% | 30 days (Stage 1) / Unlimited (Stage 2) | 4 days (Stage 1) / 7 days (Stage 2) | 2% relative drawdown | After completing Stage 2 |
Based on all the analyses presented in this article, if your goal is to choose a one-phase challenge with the highest level of flexibility, the fewest trading restrictions, and the fastest access to a live account, the Fenefx prop firm is the option that has effectively met all professional standards. The absence of a time limit, no requirement for a minimum number of trading days, flexible risk management rules, and the ability to withdraw profits from the very first day of the live account have turned this prop into a standout choice for both Iranian and international traders. Alongside these advantages, an initial 80% profit split and a stepwise capital growth structure ensure that the trader’s effort directly contributes to account development and increased income. Unlike many competitors, Fenefx bases its evaluation on the trader’s actual ability rather than excessive strictness.
If you’ve come to the conclusion that it’s time to become a funded prop trader, the Fenefx one phase challenge is the best starting point. Go to the Fenefx prop purchase page right now, choose the account that suits you, and take your first serious step toward obtaining a live account and withdrawing real profits.
Final Conclusion
A detailed review of one phase challenges shows that despite the apparent similarity of these models, the differences between prop firms’ rules are highly decisive from the profit target and drawdown, to trading restrictions, time requirements, and the method of profit withdrawal. Choosing the right prop firm should not be based solely on advertisements or tempting profit percentages, but rather on an assessment of trading style, risk tolerance, and the need for flexibility. A swing trader, a scalper, a high volume trader, or a low frequency trader each needs a different structure, and a mistake in choosing the evaluation platform can lead to a loss of capital, opportunity, and motivation. Therefore, awareness, careful comparison, and analysis of prop firm rules are the key factors for success in one phase challenges.
Frequently Asked Questions
1) Are one phase challenges suitable for all traders?
No; this model is suitable for traders who have stable performance and do not need multi phase evaluations to prove their abilities.
2) What is the most important criterion for choosing the best one phase challenge?
The most important criterion is the alignment of the challenge rules with the trader’s trading style, not just the profit percentage or challenge duration.
3) Which factor has the greatest impact on the probability of success in a challenge?
The balance between the profit target and the drawdown level, because excessive strictness in either one makes success much more difficult.
4) Is profit withdrawal the same in all one phase challenges?
No; the payout schedule and profit split percentage differ from one prop firm to another and must be checked carefully before signing up.
Comments
Cost-wise, which works out cheaper per funded account once you factor in failed attempts? Would love a proper number-crunching follow-up on that.
My two cents: one-step suits consistent traders, but if your results still swing month to month, two-step is more forgiving. Speed isn't everything when a single bad week can end it.
Thanks for this — I honestly thought one-step just meant 'faster and easier'. Didn't realize the drawdown rules are usually tighter to compensate.
Failed phase two of a standard challenge twice, then passed a one-step on my first try. For whatever reason, the shorter runway suited my head better.
Balanced take — no hype, just the actual trade-offs. Appreciated.
